赵正, 孙于皓, 王雁斌, 等. 农户参与国家公园生态旅游收入效应实证研究[J]. 自然保护地,2025,5(3):1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024081403
引用本文: 赵正, 孙于皓, 王雁斌, 等. 农户参与国家公园生态旅游收入效应实证研究[J]. 自然保护地,2025,5(3):1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024081403
ZHAO Z, SUN Y H, WANG Y B, et al. Empirical study on the income effect of farmers' participation in national park ecotourism[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2025, 5(3): 1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024081403
Citation: ZHAO Z, SUN Y H, WANG Y B, et al. Empirical study on the income effect of farmers' participation in national park ecotourism[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2025, 5(3): 1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024081403

农户参与国家公园生态旅游收入效应实证研究

Empirical study on the income effect of farmers' participation in national park ecotourism

  • 摘要:
    目的 深入研究国家公园生态旅游对周边社区农户收入的影响,对于妥善处理社区发展、农户生计与自然资源保护之间的平衡具有重要意义。
    方法 以典型国家公园周边社区农户的问卷调查数据为基础,运用倾向性匹配得分方法,对不同生态旅游模式下农户收入的异质性影响进行了实证分析,并对结果的平衡性进行了检验。
    结果 研究结果表明,生态旅游有助于提高农户收入。在倾向得分匹配后,实验组农户的收入状况优于对照组。其中,休闲度假模式对农户收入的提升最为显著,其次是采摘观光和民俗村模式,而农家乐模式的影响相对较小。在农户收入的绝对值方面,采摘观光和休闲度假模式较高,农家乐和民俗村模式较低。本研究创新性地运用倾向性匹配得分法,有效降低了选择性偏差和内生性干扰,为准确评估生态旅游的收入效应提供了新视角。研究揭示了生态旅游对农户收入的真实影响,为国家公园生态旅游模式的优化提供了实证依据。
    结论 生态旅游对提升国家公园周边社区农户收入具有积极作用,在推进国家公园建设时应充分考虑生态旅游模式的选择,科学评估农户收入效应,以促进社区农户利益的提升与国家公园的可持续发展。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Conducting in-depth research on the impact of national park ecotourism on the income of surrounding community farmers is of great significance for balancing community development, farmers' livelihoods, and natural resource conservation.
    Methods Based on questionnaire survey data of typical community farmers around national parks, this study employed propensity score matching method to empirically analyze the heterogeneous impact of farmers' income under different ecotourism modes, and tested the balance of the results.
    Results The results indicated that ecotourism helped to increase farmers' income. Following the implementation of propensity score matching, the income status of the experimental group of farmers was found to be superior to that of the control group. The impact of the leisure vacation mode on the income of farmers was found to be the most significant, followed by the picking sightseeing and folk village modes. The influence of the rural tourism mode, however, was relatively small. In terms of the absolute value of farmers' income, the modes of picking sightseeing, and leisure vacation were relatively high, while the modes of rural tourism and folk villages were comparatively diminished. The propensity score matching results also indicated that there were selective biases and endogenous interference in the decision-making of farmers participating in ecotourism, which may lead to underestimation or misjudgment of project effectiveness evaluation. This study innovatively used the propensity score matching method to effectively reduce selection bias and endogeneity interference, thereby providing a novel perspective for accurately evaluating the income effects of ecotourism. The study revealed the true impact of ecotourism on farmers' income, providing empirical evidence for the optimization of ecotourism models in national parks.
    Conclusions Ecotourism had a positive effect on increasing the income of farmers in the surrounding communities of national parks. Therefore, when promoting the construction of national parks, the selection of ecotourism models should be given full consideration, and the income effects of farmers should be scientifically evaluated to promote the improvement of community farmers' interests and the future development of national parks.

     

/

返回文章
返回