邹启先, 杨楠, 田基鹏, 等. 贵州麻阳河国家级自然保护区红腹锦鸡日活动节律及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 自然保护地,2026,6(0):1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024072202
引用本文: 邹启先, 杨楠, 田基鹏, 等. 贵州麻阳河国家级自然保护区红腹锦鸡日活动节律及其对人为干扰的响应[J]. 自然保护地,2026,6(0):1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024072202
ZOU Q X, YANG N, TIAN J P, et al. Daily activity rhythms of Chrysolophus Pictus and its responses to anthropogenic disturbance in Mayanghe National Nature Reserve, China[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 6(0): 1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024072202
Citation: ZOU Q X, YANG N, TIAN J P, et al. Daily activity rhythms of Chrysolophus Pictus and its responses to anthropogenic disturbance in Mayanghe National Nature Reserve, China[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 6(0): 1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024072202

贵州麻阳河国家级自然保护区红腹锦鸡日活动节律及其对人为干扰的响应

Daily activity rhythms of Chrysolophus Pictus and its responses to anthropogenic disturbance in Mayanghe National Nature Reserve, China

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较不同时期红腹锦鸡的活动节律及其对人为干扰的响应,深入解析红腹锦鸡行为活动模式在不同时期的适应性变化,为保护区制定针对性保护措施提供科学依据。
    方法 2019年2月—2020年10月,利用ArcGIS 10.2软件在贵州麻阳河国家级自然保护区全域按1 km×1 km划分网格,每隔2 km2在一个网格设置1台相机位点,共布设159台红外相机监测位点,共138台相机正常运行,累计工作时长63 963日。采用核密度估计方法分析红腹锦鸡日活动节律在人类干扰和家畜干扰情景下的差异。
    结果 红腹锦鸡白天活动较强,呈典型的昼行性,且不同时期和不同干扰条件下的活动节律明显不同。在繁殖季,红腹锦鸡的活动节律与干扰类型的时间分布模式具有显著差异(P<0. 05),活动重叠程度较小,且活动高峰存在明显错峰现象;在非繁殖季,红腹锦鸡的活动节律与不同干扰类型的分布模式无显著差异,但仍一定程度上表现出时间上的回避现象。不同时期红腹锦鸡活动节律与家畜活动模式的重叠系数较低,家畜活动可能对红腹锦鸡的活动节律影响更大。
    结论 针对人为干扰,红腹锦鸡在时间尺度上呈明显的回避行为,特别是在繁殖季,人为干扰对红腹锦鸡的活动节律影响更大,在后续保护措施中保护区应重点关注人为干扰。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives By comparing the activity rhythms of Chrysolophus pictus across different periods and their responses to anthropogenic disturbances, this study thoroughly analyzed the adaptive behavioral shifts in the species’ activity patterns under various conditions, thereby providing a scientific basis for formulating targeted conservation measures within the nature reserve.
    Methods From February 2019 to October 2020, the entire area of Guizhou Mayanghe National Nature Reserve was divided into a grid of 1 km×1 km grid using ArcGIS 10.2 software. A camera trapping site was set up every 2 km2 within a grid cell, with a total of 159 infrared camera monitoring sites deployed. Among these, 138 cameras operated normally, accumulating a total effort of 63,963 camera trap days. The kernel density estimation method was adopted to analyze differences in the activity rhythms of C. pictus under scenarios of human disturbance and livestock disturbance.
    Results The results showed that the C. pictus exhibited stronger daytime activity, displaying typical diurnal patterns. Activity rhythms varied significantly across periods and under varying disturbance conditions. During the breeding period, the activity rhythms of the C. pictus were significantly different from the temporal distribution patterns of the different disturbance types (P < 0.05), with less overlap in activity and a clear staggering of activity peaks. In contrast, during the non-breeding period, the activity rhythms of the C. pictus were not significantly different from the distribution patterns of the different disturbance types, but still showed some degree of temporal avoidance. The overlap coefficients between the activity rhythms of the C. pictus and livestock activity patterns were low, suggesting that livestock activity may exert a greater influence on the activity rhythms of the C. pictus.
    Conclusions In response to human disturbance, C. pictus showed clear temporal avoidance behavior, particularly during the breeding season when human disturbance had a more pronounced impact on its activity rhythm. Consequently, future conservation measures in the reserve should prioritize management strategies that minimize human disturbance.

     

/

返回文章
返回