王佳祺, 魏华, 曾利红. 危害国家重点保护植物罪的司法适用分析与立法完善[J]. 自然保护地,2026,6(0):1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024060402
引用本文: 王佳祺, 魏华, 曾利红. 危害国家重点保护植物罪的司法适用分析与立法完善[J]. 自然保护地,2026,6(0):1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024060402
WANG J Q, WEI H, ZENG L H. Analysis of the judicial application and legislative improvement of the crime of endangering national key protected plants[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 6(0): 1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024060402
Citation: WANG J Q, WEI H, ZENG L H. Analysis of the judicial application and legislative improvement of the crime of endangering national key protected plants[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 6(0): 1−10. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024060402

危害国家重点保护植物罪的司法适用分析与立法完善

Analysis of the judicial application and legislative improvement of the crime of endangering national key protected plants

  • 摘要:
    目的 基于危害国家重点保护植物罪的司法实践现状,分析我国野生植物犯罪刑事规制存在的不足,提出相应的立法完善建议,以强化我国野生植物保护的法律基础,推动生态文明价值理念的贯彻落实。
    方法 以《中华人民共和国刑法》第三百四十四条“危害国家重点保护植物罪”为切入点,对我国野生植物犯罪的刑事规制进行考察。借助北大法宝平台,检索该罪名相关司法案例,通过法宝联想功能筛选获得有效样本案例380例。在此基础上,对样本案例的犯罪行为类型、判处结果、量刑因素等方面进行实证分析。
    结果 当前危害国家重点保护植物罪的司法实践存在犯罪行为类型不均衡,裁判量刑偏轻、罪刑不相适应以及犯罪前端化预防不足等问题。从立法层面剖析,原因主要包括行刑衔接立法存在疏漏、罪名多元生态法益保护未司法化、刑罚设置不够合理以及跨部门协作机制尚不健全。
    结论 基于问题及成因分析,针对性提出相关立法完善建议:出台野生植物保护专门法律或制定环境法典;明确多元生态法益作为量刑标准;增设刑罚辅助性措施;建立健全多部门协作机制。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Based on the current judicial practice of the crime of endangering national key protected plants, this study analyzed the shortcomings in the criminal regulation of wild plant crimes in China and proposed corresponding legislative improvements, aiming to strengthen the legal foundation for wild plant conservation and advance the implementation of ecological civilization values.
    Methods Taking Article 344 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, the "Crime of Endangering National Key Protected Plants," as the entry point, this study examines the criminal regulation of wild plant crimes in China. Using the PKULaw platform, judicial cases related to this crime were retrieved, and 380 valid sample cases were selected through the PKULaw Association function. Based on this, an empirical analysis was conducted on the types of criminal acts, sentencing outcomes, and sentencing factors in the sample cases.
    Results The current judicial practice of the Crime of Endangering National Key Protected Plants exhibited issues such as an imbalance in the types of criminal acts, lenient sentencing that failed to match the severity of the crime, and insufficient pre-crime prevention. From a legislative perspective, the main reasons included gaps in the connection between administrative and criminal law, the lack of judicial recognition of multiple ecological legal interests, unreasonable penalty settings, and inadequate cross-departmental coordination mechanism.
    Conclusions Based on an analysis of the issues and their causes, targeted recommendations for improving relevant legislation are proposed: to formulate the specialized law or establish the ecological environment code; to clarify multi-criminal ecological legal interests as the sentencing criteria; to add supplementary penalty measures; to establish robust multi-departmental coordination mechanisms.

     

/

返回文章
返回