吴羽璇, 包正铎, 陈世洋, 等. 异龙湖流域土地利用和生态系统服务价值动态评估[J]. 自然保护地,2026,6(1):1−12. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024051701
引用本文: 吴羽璇, 包正铎, 陈世洋, 等. 异龙湖流域土地利用和生态系统服务价值动态评估[J]. 自然保护地,2026,6(1):1−12. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024051701
WU Y X, BAO Z D, CHEN S Y, et al. Dynamic assessment of land-use and ecosystem service value of the Yilong Lake Basin[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 6(1): 1−12. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024051701
Citation: WU Y X, BAO Z D, CHEN S Y, et al. Dynamic assessment of land-use and ecosystem service value of the Yilong Lake Basin[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 6(1): 1−12. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024051701

异龙湖流域土地利用和生态系统服务价值动态评估

Dynamic assessment of land-use and ecosystem service value of the Yilong Lake Basin

  • 摘要:
    目的 系统评估异龙湖流域土地利用格局变化及流域生态系统服务功能的响应。
    方法 以异龙湖流域土地利用数据为基础,基于生态系统服务价值核算体系,评估了2009—2022年异龙湖流域土地利用、生态系统服务价值(ESV)的动态变化。
    结果 研究期内不同用地类型的变化速度排序为未利用地>园地>草地>建设用地>耕地>水域>林地,整个研究期内异龙湖流域的土地利用程度综合指数为236~238;研究期内共有38.4%流域面积发生土地利用转移,其中2009—2014年、2014—2019年、2019—2022年分别为382,13 703和253 hm2,发生土地利用转移的主要类型为林地转为园地、耕地转为林地、耕地转为园地、耕地转为建设用地、林地转为耕地、草地转为林地、林地转为建设用地等;流域ESV总量为1.9×109元,单位面积ESV为5.3×104元/hm2,ESV总量在研究期内呈现波动增加趋势,其ESV主要体现在流域的水文调节、气候调节以及生物多样性等支持服务功能方面,流域各用地类型的生态系统服务价值总量贡献为水域>林地>园地>耕地>草地>未利用地>建设用地。
    结论 异龙湖流域的生产活动和生态环境治理,动态改变了流域用地类型,在一定程度上对流域ESV总量和不同服务功能的ESV价值产生了不同影响。该成果为流域土地资源合理规划开发和生态环境保护提供科学参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Assessing the dynamic changes of the land-use patterns of the Yilong Lake Basin (YLB), and quantifying the ecosystem service value (ESV) variations responding to land-use change.
    Methods Based on the land-use data of YLB and an ESV accounting system, we evaluated the dynamic changes in land-use and ESV from 2009 to 2022.
    Results The rate of change in different land-use types during the study period ranked as unused land > garden land > grassland > construction land > crop land > water body> forest land. The comprehensive index of land-use degree of YLB was 236~238. During the study period, 38.4% of the basin area experienced land use transitions, with transition areas of 382 ha, 13,703 ha, and 253 ha for the periods 2009–2014, 2014–2019, and 2019–2022, respectively. The main type of land-use transitions included forest land to garden land; cropland to forest land; cropland to garden land; cropland to construction land, forest land to cropland, grassland to forest land, and forest land to construction land. The total ESV of YLB was estimated as 1.9×109 Yuan with a unit value of 5.3×104 Yuan/hm2. During the whole study period, the total ESV of YLB showed an increasing trend. Among the specific ecosystem service functions, hydrological regulation, climate regulation, and biodiversity were the top 3 ESV contributors in YLB. The ESV of different land-use types ranked as waterbody > forest land > garden land > cropland > grassland > unused land > construction land.
    Conclusion Production activities and ecological environment governance in the YLB have dynamically altered land-use types, exerting varying impacts on the total ESV and the value of different ecosystem service functions. The results provided a valuable reference for the rational planning and development of land resources eco-environmental protection in the basin.

     

/

返回文章
返回