何思源, 王倩倩. 以国家公园促进乡村发展——韩国国立公园村庄的启示[J]. 自然保护地,2026,6(1):1−14. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024041902
引用本文: 何思源, 王倩倩. 以国家公园促进乡村发展——韩国国立公园村庄的启示[J]. 自然保护地,2026,6(1):1−14. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024041902
HE S Y, WANG Q Q. Promoting rural development through national parks: Insights from National Park Villages in the Republic of Korea[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 6(1): 1−14. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024041902
Citation: HE S Y, WANG Q Q. Promoting rural development through national parks: Insights from National Park Villages in the Republic of Korea[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 6(1): 1−14. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024041902

以国家公园促进乡村发展韩国国立公园村庄的启示

Promoting rural development through national parks: Insights from National Park Villages in the Republic of Korea

  • 摘要:
    目的 通过解析韩国国立公园管理中“国立公园村庄”平衡生态保护与社区发展的理念与路径,围绕我国国家公园相似的社会-生态复合系统特征与问题,提出有益于乡村发展与自然保护双赢的策略。
    方法 采用文献分析法和归纳法,梳理总结韩国国立公园平衡人地关系的一般管理与“国立公园村庄”的运营机制。
    结果 韩国国立公园管理立足其自然与人文复合特征,以功能区划和法令保障国立公园居民的存在、生计和发展权利,通过自下而上申请与自上而下支援的“名品村庄”项目发展村庄企业,建立制度化路径激励集体行动,帮助国立公园村庄充分利用自然与文化遗产资源,结合村庄自身的历史沿革和产业特色,创新国立公园游憩体验,成为经济发展、社会稳定与文化传承的可持续乡村。
    结论 韩国国立公园村庄是解决韩国自然保护管理中乡村发展问题的制度化路径,其上下协同、差异发展、培育村庄企业的思路和方法为融合自然与文化遗产保护,促进乡村生计发展与稳定发挥了持续性作用。中国国家公园建设可以借鉴“名品村庄”的建设思路和实践路径,找准生物多样性保护和乡村振兴战略的衔接点,以生态保护为根本前提,立足乡村资源禀赋特征与发展诉求,通过政府引领与保障引入市场机制,补齐乡村经营的资本和能力短板,以村庄型企业引领国家公园品牌建设。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives This research aimed at targeted strategies that were beneficial for both rural development and nature conservation adapted to the complexity of social-ecological systems in China’s National Parks, by delving into the ideology and practices of National Park Villages in the Republic of Korea that balanced conservation and community development.
    Methods By using literature analysis and inductive methods, this research summarized the general management approaches of balancing human-land relationships and the operational mechanism of National Park Villages.
    Results Korean National Parks conserved the complex natural-cultural heritages. They guaranteed the rights of residents in terms of presence, livelihood, and development through functional zoning and legislation. National Park Agency helped to develop the Premium Villages into social enterprises through combination of bottom-up applications and top-down incentives. This became an institutionalized approach to incentivize collective actions for communities to make full use of their natural and cultural heritages based on their historical and industrial features, innovating national park recreational experience and growing into sustainable villages with economic development, social stability, and cultural inheritance.
    Conclusions The National Park Villages in the Republic of Korea represented an institutionalized approach to addressing rural development within the context of nature conservation management. The approach that coordinated management agency and rural communities, sought differentiated development, and developed village enterprises has sustained rural livelihood development and its stability from integrating nature and culture conservation. China’s National Parks can draw inspiration from the ideas and the realization. Seeking the interface between biodiversity conservation and rural revitalization strategy, governments should introduce market mechanism to fill the gaps of capital and capacity in rural operations to adapt to village endowments and development demands under conservation targets, thereby promoting village enterprises to spearhead the branding of national parks.

     

/

返回文章
返回