牛赟, 王顺利, 王红义, 等. 甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区森林碳储量及固碳增汇潜力评估[J]. 自然保护地,2025,5(4):119−130. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024021901
引用本文: 牛赟, 王顺利, 王红义, 等. 甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区森林碳储量及固碳增汇潜力评估[J]. 自然保护地,2025,5(4):119−130. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024021901
NIU Y, WANG S L, WANG H Y, et al. Estimations of forest carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve, Gansu Province[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2025, 5(4): 119−130. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024021901
Citation: NIU Y, WANG S L, WANG H Y, et al. Estimations of forest carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve, Gansu Province[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2025, 5(4): 119−130. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024021901

甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区森林碳储量及固碳增汇潜力评估

Estimations of forest carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve, Gansu Province

  • 摘要:
    目的 自然保护地是实现“碳中和”任务的重要依托区,对该区域森林植被碳储量及固碳增汇潜力进行准确估算,是应对气候变化、统筹区域生态、经济、社会协同全面发展的重要举措。
    方法 将甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区作为研究区,基于森林资源二类调查数据,采用材积源生物量法、空间代替时间法对自然保护区森林植被碳储量和碳密度及其潜力进行了评估。
    结果 ①甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区森林植被总碳储量和平均碳密度分别为1.41×107 Mg和21.09 Mg/hm2,其中乔木林碳储量占比高达73.62%,是灌木林平均碳密度的6.45倍、疏林的1.15倍。②森林植被碳储量和碳密度在不同区域相差悬殊,碳储量最多和最少的区域分别是隆畅河站(1.50×106 Mg)和龙首山站(1.91×104 Mg),碳密度最大和最小的区域分别是昌岭山站(39.7 Mg/hm2)和东大河站(12.68 Mg/hm2);建立国家公园管理体制和合理有序加大植树造林任务对于提高森林植被固碳能力具有一定的积极作用。③青海云杉碳储量占保护区总碳储量的66.98%,红桦、青海云杉纯林和针叶、针阔混交林的平均碳密度均大于40 Mg/hm2,比其他森林类型的平均碳密度更高。④碳储量最多和平均碳密度最大的林种分别是自然保护林和其他防护林,龄组分别是成熟林和近成熟林。⑤保护区总固碳增汇潜力为1.00×107 Mg,主体贡献主要来源于其他荒山荒滩宜林地的造林工程。
    结论 研究成果可为国际气候谈判和地球碳循环研究提供参考,为森林碳源/汇、碳储量等评估提供依据,为森林经营水平评价和经营措施跟踪指导提供技术支撑。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Natural protected areas are the key supporting regions to implement carbon neutralization action in China. Accurate estimations of carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of forest vegetation are important measures to address climate change and coordinate the coordinated and comprehensive regional eco-economy and social development.
    Methods The research area for the study was Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province. The data set for the study was derived from the forest resource survey of the second category. The tree species (group) and age group were the basis for evaluating the carbon storage and density and potential of forest vegetation in the nature reserves. The volume-source biomass method and the space-time substitution method were used to conduct this evaluation.
    Results (1) The total carbon storage of forest vegetation in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province was 1.41×107 Mg, and the average carbon density was 21.09 Mg/hm2. The proportion of carbon storage in arbor forests accounted for 73.62%, and the average carbon density was 6.45 times that of shrub wood and 1.15 times that of open forests. (2) The carbon storage and carbon density of forest vegetation were greatly various in different regions. The regions of Longchang River Reserve (1.50×106 Mg) and Longshou Mountain Reserve (1.91×104 Mg) had the highest and lowest carbon storage, and the areas with the highest and lowest carbon densities were Changling Mountain Reserve (39.7 Mg/hm2) and Dongdahe Reserve (12.68 Mg/hm2), respectively. The establishment of a national park system and a rational and orderly increase in afforestation tasks have a positive effect on improving the carbon sequestration capacity of forest vegetation. (3) The carbon storage of Picea crassifolia Kom. accounted for 66.98% of the total carbon storage in the forest area, and the average carbon density of Betula albo-sinensis Burk, pure forest and coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest of Picea crassifolia Kom. was greater than 40 Mg/hm2, which was higher than that of other forest types. (4) The forest species with the greatest carbon storage and average carbon density are nature conservation forests and other shelter forests, respectively, and the forest age group with the largest carbon storage and average carbon density are mature forest and near-mature forest. (5) The total carbon sequestration potential of the forest area was 1.00×107 Mg, and the main contribution was the afforestation projects of other barren mountains and beaches suitable for afforestation.
    Conclusions The research results can provide valuable insights that can inform international climate negotiations and research endeavors concerning the Earth’s carbon cycle. They also established a foundation for evaluating forest carbon sources and sinks, as well as for assessing the storage of carbon within forests. Furthermore, the study provided a technical support for forest management level evaluation and management measures tracking guidance.

     

/

返回文章
返回