王鹏, 俞飞, 何友均, 等. 国家公园景观视觉美学质量对公众生理反应的影响[J]. 自然保护地,2024,4(1):13−24. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2023062802
引用本文: 王鹏, 俞飞, 何友均, 等. 国家公园景观视觉美学质量对公众生理反应的影响[J]. 自然保护地,2024,4(1):13−24. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2023062802
WANG P, YU F, HE Y J, et al. Study on the influence of visual aesthetic quality of national park landscape on public physiological response[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2024, 4(1): 13−24. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2023062802
Citation: WANG P, YU F, HE Y J, et al. Study on the influence of visual aesthetic quality of national park landscape on public physiological response[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2024, 4(1): 13−24. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2023062802

国家公园景观视觉美学质量对公众生理反应的影响

Study on the influence of visual aesthetic quality of national park landscape on public physiological response

  • 摘要: 【目的】评估景观视觉美学质量及其对公众的生理影响,为构建国家公园景观资源评价制度提供决策参考。【方法】采用美景度(Scenic beauty evaluation,SBE)、K−均值聚类、ArcGis空间分析与生理反应测定实验等技术方法,探讨钱江源国家公园景观视觉美学质量及其对公众生理反应的影响。【结果】① 钱江源国家公园景观视觉美学质量处于中高水平,文化景观(SBE 76.33)>水域景观(SBE 76.15)>森林景观(SBE 74.57)>乡村景观(SBE 72.29);② 钱江源国家公园视觉美学质量呈现中部高、南北低的空间格局特征,游憩展示区(SBE 76.84)>传统利用区(SBE 75.63)>生态保育区(SBE 74.57)>核心保护区(SBE 69.16);③ 景观视觉美学感知会使人出现皮肤电导水平下降、呼吸频率增加的生理反应变化。美学质量最高的文化景观,其呼吸频率变化值最大(0.907 resp);美学质量最低的乡村景观,其呼吸频率变化值最小(0.528 resp)。【结论】相比景观面积规模,景观元素的多样性以及元素间的视觉协调性更能影响景观美学质量评价,并促使公众皮肤电导率和呼吸频率等生理指标发生变化。建议从视觉感官与促进人体健康等角度,加强多功能景观管理,尤其是游憩林与康养林的精细化经营。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To evaluate the visual aesthetic quality of landscape and its physiological impact on the public, so as to provide decision-making reference for constructing landscape resources evaluation system of national parks.
      Methods  The visual aesthetic quality of Qianjiangyuan National Park and its influence on the physiological response of the public were investigated by using the techniques of beauty degree (SBE), K-mean clustering, ArcGis spatial analysis and physiological response measurement.
      Results  The results showed that: (1) the visual aesthetic quality of national park landscape was in the medium and high level, cultural landscape (SBE=76.33) > water landscape (76.15) > forest landscape (74.57) > rural landscape (72.29). (2) The visual aesthetic quality of the national parks showed a spatial pattern of high quality in the central part and low quality in the north and south. The recreational display area (SBE=76.84) > traditional use area (75.63) > ecological conservation area (74.57) > core protection area (69.16). (3) Landscape visual aesthetic perception can cause physiological response changes such as decreased skin conductance level and increased respiratory rate. The cultural landscape with the highest aesthetic quality had the largest change in respiratory rate (0.907 resp). The rural landscape with the lowest aesthetic quality had the lowest variation in respiratory rate (0.528 resp). This study has important reference value to realize the scientific management of national park landscape.
      Conclusion  Compared with landscape area and scale, the diversity of landscape elements and the visual coordination between elements have more influence on landscape aesthetic quality evaluation, and promote the change of physiological indicators such as skin conductivity and respiratory rate of the public. It is suggested to strengthen the management of multifunctional landscape from the perspective of visual sense and promoting human health, especially the fine management of recreational forest and healthy forest.

     

/

返回文章
返回