唐双娥. 我国自然保护地碳汇功能实现的制度优势、障碍与完善建议[J]. 自然保护地,2022,2(4):40−50. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2022083104
引用本文: 唐双娥. 我国自然保护地碳汇功能实现的制度优势、障碍与完善建议[J]. 自然保护地,2022,2(4):40−50. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2022083104
TANG Shuang’e. Institutional Advantages, Obstacles, and Improvement Suggestions to the Realization of Carbon Sink Function of Natural Protected Areas in China[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2022, 2(4): 40−50. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2022083104
Citation: TANG Shuang’e. Institutional Advantages, Obstacles, and Improvement Suggestions to the Realization of Carbon Sink Function of Natural Protected Areas in China[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2022, 2(4): 40−50. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2022083104

我国自然保护地碳汇功能实现的制度优势、障碍与完善建议

Institutional Advantages, Obstacles, and Improvement Suggestions to the Realization of Carbon Sink Function of Natural Protected Areas in China

  • 摘要: 自然保护地以碳保存的方式实现生物固碳,具有稳定性与持久性,有助于我国“双碳”目标的实现。在我国国土空间规划中,自然保护地被纳入生态保护红线,实施自然生态空间用途管制,对自然保护地固碳有促进作用。这使得自然保护地碳汇功能在土地利用、土地利用变化及林业(Land use,land use change and forestry, LULUCF)上享有制度优势。然而,自然保护地内的自然资源权属多元化,必然影响到自然保护地碳汇功能的稳定。同时,碳汇功能作为非传统的财产利益在私法上尚未被明确成为财产权,在私法上碳汇归属规则也是缺失的。这成为自然保护地碳汇功能实现的制度障碍。因此,应修改包括《民法典》在内的法律,将碳汇功能确认为一项独立的财产利益,明确碳汇功能的利益归属规则;在碳排放权交易中,将自然保护地碳汇项目规定为可优先用于抵消的国家核证自愿减排项目。

     

    Abstract: Natural protected areas achieve biological carbon sequestration in the form of carbon preservation. The carbon pool in natural protected areas plays the role of a carbon sink rather than a carbon source, and the carbon sink has stability and durability. Thus, the carbon sink function of natural protected areas can contribute to the realization of the “carbon emission and carbon neutrality goal” in China. In the national land space, natural protected areas are included in the ecological protection red line, a special plan is formulated for them, and the use of natural ecological space of natural protected areas is regulated. Therefore, the carbon sink function of natural protected areas shows an institutional advantages in LULUCF. However, the ownership of natural resources in natural protected areas is diverse and the stability of the carbon sink function in natural protected areas will inevitably be affected. At the same time, carbon sinks, as non-traditional property interests, have not been clearly defined as property rights in private law. The lack of carbon sink ownership rules in private law has become an institutional obstacle to the realization of carbon sink function in natural protected areas. To this end, laws, including the Civil Code, should be amended, take the biological carbon sink as an independent property interest, and clarify the attribution rules for the biological carbon sink interest. Carbon sink projects in natural protected areas should be specified as nationally certified voluntary emission reduction projects in carbon emission trading that can be used for offset first.

     

/

返回文章
返回