留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于社交媒体UGC图片数据的景观偏好研究

潘云 李健

潘云, 李健. 基于社交媒体UGC图片数据的景观偏好研究—以西溪国家湿地公园为例[J]. 自然保护地,2021,1(1):100−108 doi:  10.12335/2096-8981.2020120601
引用本文: 潘云, 李健. 基于社交媒体UGC图片数据的景观偏好研究—以西溪国家湿地公园为例[J]. 自然保护地,2021,1(1):100−108 doi:  10.12335/2096-8981.2020120601
PAN Yun, LI Jian. Landscape Preference Based on User-generated Photograph Metadata: The Case of Xixi National Wetland Park[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2021, 1(1): 100−108 doi:  10.12335/2096-8981.2020120601
Citation: PAN Yun, LI Jian. Landscape Preference Based on User-generated Photograph Metadata: The Case of Xixi National Wetland Park[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2021, 1(1): 100−108 doi:  10.12335/2096-8981.2020120601

基于社交媒体UGC图片数据的景观偏好研究

——以西溪国家湿地公园为例

doi: 10.12335/2096-8981.2020120601
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划课题资助项目(2016YFC0502704);浙江省科技厅软科学研究计划(2019C35085)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:lijian@zafu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: X36

Landscape Preference Based on User-generated Photograph Metadata: The Case of Xixi National Wetland Park

  • 摘要: 以社交媒体网站Flickr、Tripadvisor、500px、马蜂窝中西溪湿地相关图片数据作为研究素材,采用扎根理论图片分析的编码方法,从景观偏好类别与具体景观要素两个方面研究游客对西溪湿地的景观感知与偏好要素。结果显示:在景观偏好类别方面,游客更加偏好水体景观、建筑景观、植被景观、游览设施、园路景观;在具体景观要素方面,绿色、透明度高、周围景观丰富、可视面积大、蜿蜒曲折的水体,临水而建、材质自然、风格淡雅的园林建筑,色彩鲜艳的花卉,景观空间序列组织良好的船行路线,铺装材质自然、曲折的园路是游客偏好的主要景观要素。对于湿地景观而言,可以从水体、建筑、植被、游览设施、园路要素入手,提升整体景观的自然性、开放性、神秘性以及游览路线的节奏、空间对比、意境来增加其美学价值。
  • 图  1  主要研究思路

    Figure  1.  Main research ideas

    图  2  自由节点词汇频次云视图

    Figure  2.  Free node vocabulary frequency cloud view

    图  3  游客图片中的水体景观举例(引自马蜂窝与Flickr)

    Figure  3.  Examples of water landscapes in tourist photos

    图  4  游客图片中的人文景观举例(引自马蜂窝)

    Figure  4.  Examples of cultural landscapes in tourist photos

    图  5  游客图片中的植被景观举例(引自马蜂窝与Flickr)

    Figure  5.  Examples of vegetation landscapes in tourist photos

    图  6  游客图片中的游览设施举例(引自马蜂窝与500px)

    Figure  6.  Examples of tour facilities in tourist photos

    图  7  游客图片中的园路景观举例(引自马蜂窝与Flickr)

    Figure  7.  Examples of park road landscapes in tourist photos

    表  1  西溪湿地核心编码频次统计

    Table  1.   Core node coding frequency statistics table

    排序核心编码频次(次)比例(%)
    1水体景观100427.46
    2建筑景观74820.46
    3植物景观71119.45
    4游览设施2948.04
    5园路景观2266.18
    6民俗文化1905.20
    7气象景观1544.21
    8景观小品1173.20
    9湿地驳岸782.13
    10休闲娱乐681.86
    11湿地动物661.81
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 陈晓磬, 章海宏. 社交媒体的旅游应用研究现状及评述[J]. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(8): 35−43. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2015.08.004
    [2] Dunkel A. Visualizing the Perceived Environment Using Crowdsourced Photo Geodata[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 142: 173−186. doi:  10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022
    [3] 邓宁, 钟栎娜, 李宏. 基于UGC图片元数据的目的地形象感知: 以北京为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2018, 33(1): 53−62. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2018.01.010
    [4] Bubalo M, van Zanten B T, Verburg P H. Crowdsourcing Geo-information on Landscape Perceptions and Preferences: a Review[J]. Landscape and Urban lanning, 2019, 184: 101−111. doi:  10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.01.001
    [5] 钟栎娜. 旅游地感知结构重构: 基于文本与复杂网络分析的研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(8): 88−95. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2015.08.009
    [6] Li J, Deng J Y, Pierskalla C. Impact of Attendees' Motivation and Past Experience on their Attitudes toward the National Cherry Blossom Festival in Washington, D.C[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 36: 57−67.
    [7] 保罗·戈比斯特, 杭迪. 西方生态美学的进展: 从景观感知与评估的视角看[J]. 学术研究, 2010(4): 2−14, 159.
    [8] Tuan Y F. Topophilia: a Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values[M]. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1974.
    [9] Lewis G M. The Experience of Landscape by J. Appleton[J]. Geography, 1976, 61(3): 179−180.
    [10] Orians G H. Habitat Selection: General Theory and Applications to Human Behavior[M]//Lockard J S. The Evolution of Human Social Behavior. Chicago: Elsevier, 1980: 49−66.
    [11] Wilson E O. Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
    [12] Ulrich R S. Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1986, 13: 29−44. doi:  10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8
    [13] Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
    [14] Gobster P H. An Ecological Aesthetic for Forest Landscape Management[J]. Landscape Journal, 1999, 18(1): 54−64. doi:  10.3368/lj.18.1.54
    [15] Gobster P H, Nassauer J I, Daniel T C, et al. The Shared Landscape: What Does Aesthetics Have to Do with Ecology?[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2007, 22(7): 959−972. doi:  10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x
    [16] Teixeira F Z, Bachi L, Blanco J, et al. Perceived Ecosystem Services (ES) and Ecosystem Disservices (EDS) from Trees: Insights from three Case Studies in Brazil and France[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34(7): 1583−1600. doi:  10.1007/s10980-019-00778-y
    [17] Hwang Y H, Yue Z E J, Ling S K, et al. It's Ok to be Wilder: Preference for Natural Growth in Urban Green Spaces in a Tropical City[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2019, 38: 165−176.
    [18] Li J. Impact of Tourists' Perceived Value on Brand Loyalty: A Case Study of Xixi National Wetland Park[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 2021, 26(3): 262−276. doi:  10.1080/10941665.2020.1862882
    [19] Kaplan R. The Analysis of Perception via Preference: A Strategy for Studying How the Environment is Experienced[J]. Landscape Planning, 1985, 12(2): 161−176. doi:  10.1016/0304-3924(85)90058-9
    [20] Bishop I D. Predicting Movement Choices in Virtual Environments[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 56(3-4): 97−106. doi:  10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00177-3
    [21] Amati M, Ghanbari Parmehr E, McCarthy C, et al. How Eye-catching are Natural Features When Walking through a Park: Eye-tracking Responses to Videos of Walks[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018, 31: 67−78.
    [22] Tieskens K F, van Zanten B T, Schulp C J E, et al. Aesthetic Appreciation of the Cultural Landscape through Social Media: An Analysis of Revealed Preference in the Dutch River Landscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2018, 177: 128−137. doi:  10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.002
    [23] 鲁苗. 基于眼动技术的景观视觉感知分析:以清华大学校园景观为例[J]. 艺苑, 2019(1): 98−101. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1673-2545.2019.01.027
    [24] 孙漪南, 赵芯, 王宇泓, 等. 基于VR全景图技术的乡村景观视觉评价偏好研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(12): 104−112.
    [25] 周膺, 吴晶. 西溪湿地保护利用模式研究[M]. 北京: 当代中国出版社, 2008.
    [26] Mao T. Mining One Hundred Million Creative Commons Flickr Images Dataset to Flickr Tourist Index[J]. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, 2015, 4(2): 104−107. doi:  10.7763/IJFCC.2015.V4.365
    [27] Glaser B G, Strauss A L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research[M]. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson, 1968.
    [28] 刘滨谊, 郭佳希. 基于风景旷奥理论的视觉感受模型研究——以城市湿地公园为例[J]. 南方建筑, 2014(3): 4−9. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2014.03.004
    [29] Dobbie M, Green R. Public Perceptions of Freshwater Wetlands in Victoria, Australia[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 110: 143−154. doi:  10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.003
    [30] Tveit M, Ode Å, Fry G. Key Concepts in a Framework for Analysing Visual Landscape Character[J]. Landscape Research, 2006, 31(3): 229−255. doi:  10.1080/01426390600783269
    [31] Tveit M S. Indicators of Visual Scale as Predictors of Landscape Preference: A Comparison between Groups[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(9): 2882−2888. doi:  10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021
    [32] Zube E H, Sell J L, Taylor J G. Landscape Perception: Research, Application and Theory[J]. Landscape Planning, 1982, 9(1): 1−33. doi:  10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0
    [33] Deng J Y, Li J. Determination of Derived Importance of a Tourism Destination: A Comparison of Indirect Methods[J]. Current Issues in Tourism, 2019, 22(4): 456−475. doi:  10.1080/13683500.2018.1444588
    [34] Nassauer J I. The Aesthetics of Horticulture: Neatness as a Form of Care[J]. American Society for Horticultural Science, 1988, 23(6): 973−977.
    [35] 刘滨谊, 张亭. 基于视觉感受的景观空间序列组织[J]. 中国园林, 2010, 26(11): 31−35. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2010.11.018
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  771
  • HTML全文浏览量:  355
  • PDF下载量:  597
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-12-06
  • 修回日期:  2021-01-24
  • 刊出日期:  2021-02-25

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回